Nearly every day since July 31, Benjamin Von Wong has been surrounding his 20-foot-tall art installation, The Thinker’s Burden, with a little more plastic trash. By Thursday, parts of it could be totally obscured beneath a mountain of garbage in front of the Palais des Nations in Geneva. Von Wong, a Canadian artist, created his sculpture specifically for this month’s round of negotiations over a global plastics treaty. It features a replica of Auguste Rodin’s well-known sculpture The Thinker — only instead of sitting in solitude, the pensive man cradles a baby and is perched atop Mother Earth. A giant strand of DNA coils around him, and at the installation’s base the ground is littered with bottles, bags, and other plastic debris. Taken together, these elements represent the growing threat of plastic pollution to human health and the Earth’s ecosystems — a message to diplomats as they hem and haw over a United Nations agreement to “end plastic pollution.” “Plastics are going to have all these unintended consequences,” Von Wong told Grist. “If the goal is to protect human health in the long term, then these are issues that we can’t just run away from.” The Thinker’s Burden is just one of many pieces of art that have popped up alongside the treaty talks. Ever since U.N. delegates agreed to negotiate an agreement more than three years ago, environmental advocates have used a range of media to sway diplomats and the public, tapping into people’s emotions to break the monotony of speeches and presentations. Even the gavel used to approve the negotiations in 2022 was a piece of art — it was fashioned from plastic collected by waste pickers. Some of the most powerful pieces that have been created for the negotiations, however, have deliberately sought to shift the narrative from a simple one about the problem of plastic litter accumulating in the oceans to something more complex — namely, that the plastic crisis was caused by fossil fuel companies, that it’s damaging human health, and that it can’t be solved through waste management alone. Von Wong has been at the forefront of this effort starting with his installation Turn Off the Plastic Tap, which was featured at the U.N. Environment Assembly meeting that kicked off plastics treaty negotiations in 2022. That piece was a replica of one he had made the previous year for the Canadian government in which plastic trash gushes from a spigot elevated 30 feet in the air. The towering artwork helped to convey a popular analogy about plastic pollution: Just as it would be illogical to mop up water overflowing from a bathtub without first turning off the tap, the world should deal with its plastics problem by first addressing the material’s unmitigated production. Benjamin Von Wong’s Turn Off the Plastic Tap, featured outside the venue of a U.N. Environment Assembly meeting in 2022. Courtesy of Benjamin Von Wong The piece became a symbol of the treaty negotiations. Photos of it were endlessly circulated by business and advocacy groups and the media, and got a big boost when the U.N. Environment Programme put it on the cover of its 2023 report, “Turning Off the Tap.”  “I don’t think I realized the importance of this piece,” Von Wong said. “Literally anyone who works on the U.N. plastics treaty — they know my art, which is super cool.”  Von Wong’s work caught the advocacy world’s eyes, too. In 2023, ahead of the second round of plastics treaty negotiations in Paris, the international nonprofit Greenpeace commissioned Von Wong to put together another installation, this time focusing on the who of plastic production. The result: a 15-foot-tall “Perpetual Plastic Machine,” featuring an oil pumpjack connected to two inclined conveyor belts of disposable plastic bottles. From the top of the belts, the bottles tumble into heaps of trash. Benjamin Von Wong’s Perpetual Plastic Machine, commissioned by Greenpeace to be displayed during the plastics treaty negotiations in 2023 in Paris. Courtesy of Benjamin Von Wong “We wanted to basically convey the idea that plastic is made from oil,” said Anna Hristova, a global campaign strategist for Greenpeace International. “And unless you actually have restrictions on production, you can never decrease the plastic that we’re pumping into the world.” Indeed, virtually all plastics are made from fossil fuels, and a peer-reviewed study published last year found that there is a one-to-one correlation between plastic production and plastic pollution: The more plastic the world makes, the more pollution results. What’s the connection between plastics and climate change?Plastics are made from fossil fuels and cause greenhouse gas emissions at every stage of their lifespan, including during the extraction of oil and gas, during processing at petrochemical refineries, and upon disposal — especially if they’re incinerated. If the plastics industry were a country, it would have the world’s fourth-largest climate footprint, based on data published last year by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Research suggests that plastics are responsible for about 4 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. But this is likely an underestimate due to significant data gaps: Most countries lack greenhouse gas information on their plastics use and disposal, and the data that is available tends to focus on plastic production and specific disposal methods. Scientists are beginning to explore other ways plastics may contribute to climate change. Research suggests that plastics release greenhouse gases when exposed to UV radiation, which means there could be a large, underappreciated amount of climate pollution emanating from existing plastic products and litter. Marine microplastics may also be inhibiting the ocean’s ability to store carbon. And plastic particles in the air and on the Earth’s surface could be trapping heat or reflecting it — more research is needed.Holly Kaufman, a senior fellow at the nonprofit World Resources Institute, said it’s obvious that plastics are using up more than their fair share of the carbon budget, the amount of carbon dioxide the world can emit without surpassing 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius (2.7 or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming. Plastics have “a major climate impact that has just not been incorporated anywhere,” she said — including the U.N.’s plastics treaty. In designing his installations, Von Wong said his target audience is treaty delegates, since they’re the ones with the real decision-making power. “The way of making a difference is through policy,” he said, adding that it’s only worth installing a larger-than-life artwork if it’s in a central location. He’s been pleased to see his art become a focal point for the negotiations — it’s often served as a backdrop for photo ops and media interviews with diplomats, or as a meeting point for political demonstrations. Erin Simon, vice president and head of a plastics and business initiative from the nonprofit World Wide Fund For Nature, or WWF, said her team has a group photo in front of every one of Von Wong’s installations.  Hristova said she’s been happy to see engagement from the public, too. The Perpetual Plastic Machine was placed in a touristy area along the Seine River, right by the Musée d’Orsay, and families walking past with their children would stop and read the placards connecting oil and gas extraction to plastic pollution. By the end of the weeklong negotiations, Hristova said that the Seine’s boat tour operators had begun pointing it out on their sightseeing cruises.  Read Next The global plastics crisis explained in 6 charts Joseph Winters Art allows activists to reach “a very diverse audience,” Hristova added, including people who might not otherwise have taken an interest in the plastics problem. It’s also a tool Greenpeace uses in places where it cannot perform nonviolent direct actions, like in countries controlled by authoritarian governments. In November 2023, Greenpeace shipped the Perpetual Plastic Machine to the Gigiri Courtyard in Nairobi, Kenya, for the the third round of plastics treaty negotiations. The next round, in Ottawa, Canada, brought back Turn Off the Plastic Tap — the original was being stored in a Toronto museum, and the Canadian government paid to move it directly in front of the downtown conference venue. Von Wong lost a bid to create new art for the fifth round of negotiations in Busan, South Korea, last year, and the Korean government ultimately selected one from the artist Kim Jung-Ju. Jung-Ju’s installation was a giant whale made of marine plastic litter, which some advocates saw as disappointingly apolitical: It focused on the problem of ocean plastic pollution, which — unlike plastic production — is virtually uncontested among treaty negotiators. “Safe” was the word one observer used to describe it in an interview with Grist. Other, more provocative examples of plastics treaty art abound: a mixed-media collage of a baby doll enveloped in dirty plastic pollution, accompanied by the message, “Whose fault is this?”; an oversize spoon full of plastic particles next to a sign reading, “Stop feeding us plastic”; cookies shaped like credit cards to highlight the cumulative weight of microplastics that people unknowingly ingest every week. Define art liberally and you could include any number of protests too, since their purpose is to create a spectacle through creative combinations of people, signage, music, and poetry. Clockwise from left: Credit card cookies, a giant spoon full of plastics, and a doll surrounded by plastic pollution with the message, “Whose fault is this?” — all created for the fifth round of plastics treaty negotiations in Busan, South Korea. Kiara Worth / Earth Negotiations Bulletin via IISD     At one event in Busan, WWF and Greenpeace combined a few of these strategies when they delivered a petition to delegates from Brazil, Fiji, Rwanda, and the U.S. The event included a globe created by the local artist Eunha Kim and handed to the delegates by two Korean children, as well as an original poem read by the Irish-Indian poet and playwright Nikita Gill. Like Von Wong’s art, Gill’s poem called out fossil fuel companies for their role in the plastics crisis and highlighted the need to reduce plastic production. But her medium allowed her to connect these ideas to other, more emotional ones, like her love for her young niece and nephew, both aspiring marine biologists whose futures could be tarnished by unchecked plastic production. A poet’s duty, Gill told Grist, is to “just tell the truth, and tell it as beautifully as you can.” Art can also be participatory. Last year, also for the talks in Busan, Greenpeace commissioned the self-described “artivist” Dan Acher to compile portraits of more than 4,600 people from around the world into a 10-story-high flag — a replica of one of Acher’s previous works. Up close, the portraits showed people’s messages to negotiators: “You can’t eat plastic nor money,” for example. From a distance, they were strategically shaded to make up a gigantic eye, accompanied by the message, “The world is watching.” Dan Acher’s flag depicts a giant eye, with the message “The world is watching,” during the fifth round of negotiations for a global plastics treaty in Busan, South Korea, last year. Anthony Wallace / AFP via Getty Images In general, it’s hard to quantify art’s impact. Some artists and environmental groups look at press coverage and social media impressions, as well as the number of people who interact with their art in person. Simon, with WWF, said it would be disingenuous to draw a straight line from a piece of art to a particular diplomatic outcome; the treaty negotiations are too complicated. What’s more important is to treat art as one of many tools that can lead to change. “You have this combined set of strategies to influence, and they’re all going to target different negotiators in a variety of different ways,” she told Grist. More art appeared last week at the start of the latest round of plastics treaty talks in Switzerland. Some of it fell into that safer, less contentious category about the problem of plastic pollution, like a collection of 500 “jellyfish” made from recovered trash, and an installation showing 1 million used cigarette butts — one of the most commonly littered types of plastic.  But the emphasis on human health and on addressing the full life cycle of plastics, including their production, was still prominent, not only in Von Wong’s The Thinker’s Burden. The nonprofit Minderoo Foundation, for example, handed out cheeky graphics on the importance of addressing toxic chemicals in the treaty: They featured black-and-white portraits of people with the messages “Sick to my testicles” and “Sick to my uterus.” WWF also unveiled an interactive “plastic conveyor belt” outside the conference venue, showing plastic waste entering the mouths of a sea turtle, a man, and a dolphin. A tattoo reading “Caution: contains microplastics” and posters from the Minderoo Foundation connecting plastics to reproductive health. Courtesy of Break Free From Plastic; Joseph Winters / Grist Break Free From Plastic, a global network of environmental groups, distributed brain-shaped hats with pieces of plastic poking out of them, and gave out temporary tattoos reading “Caution: contains microplastics.” They also solicited poetry in five languages, building on the themes that Gill touched on during her delivery last year. Terese Teoh, a 24-year-old poet from Singapore and one of the artists that Break Free From Plastic commissioned, said the art in Geneva should remind people of the human dimensions of plastic policy. Targeting people’s emotions can make complex political issues “so much more evocative and memorable, and leave a stronger impression,” she told Grist, though still suspects some delegates are “immune to creativity.” That doesn’t mean she won’t keep trying to reach them.   As for Von Wong, he started day nine of the treaty negotiations just like the other days: hauling more plastic on top of The Thinker’s Burden, hopeful that his spectacle would resonate, at least in some small way, with the delegates huddled inside the Palais des Nations. toolTips(‘.classtoolTips3’,’Carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and other gases that prevent heat from escaping Earth’s atmosphere. Together, they act as a blanket to keep the planet at a liveable temperature in what is known as the “greenhouse effect.” Too many of these gases, however, can cause excessive warming, disrupting fragile climates and ecosystems.’); This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The art of a plastics treaty: How sculptures, collages, and poetry have influenced global talks on Aug 12, 2025.

Read original article

Read original article