| The UK has abandoned projects worth tens of millions of pounds that were meant to help protect Congo rainforests and support local people. Together, these initiatives would have made up around half of the £200m that the UK pledged to support conservation in the Congo basin – the world’s second-largest rainforest. When it hosted COP26 in Glasgow, the UK led a new initiative to end forest loss, which included a collective pledge by 12 donors of ‘at least’ $1.5bn (£1.1bn) for Congo rainforest nations by 2025. Development minister Jenny Chapman revealed last week that, as of 2024, the UK had only provided £39.8m towards this goal. Alongside the US and much of Europe, the UK has significantly cut its aid budget in recent years, leading to much of its Congo rainforest spending being cancelled or reappraised. The government says it still plans to ‘prioritise’ rainforest regions, including the Congo basin, but civil society groups and MPs are concerned about the lack of ‘ring-fenced’ forest funding in the UK’s new aid strategy. COP pledge At COP26, the UK – led by then prime minister Boris Johnson – launched the ‘Glasgow leaders’ declaration’, with a goal to ‘halt and reverse forest loss’ by 2030. This was backed by more than 140 nations. The UK also made various funding pledges, including £200m to protect the Congo basin, £350m for tropical forests in Indonesia and ‘up to £300m’ for the Amazon. These commitments target the world’s three largest rainforests, all of which face major forest loss due to threats such as agriculture, logging and climate change. The Congo basin is the planet’s largest forested carbon sink. Yet, its six host nations are among the poorest in the world and face significant funding barriers. This has global ramifications. An official UK assessment warned that ‘degradation or collapse’ of the Amazon or Congo rainforests ‘threaten UK national security and prosperity’. Forest cuts Following successive aid cuts introduced by both the Conservative and then Labour governments – tracking a global trend – the UK’s Congo funding is under threat. The Congo basin forest action programme (CBFA) was launched by the UK at COP27. It was explicitly set up to provide ‘roughly half’ of the UK’s £200m Congo pledge. CBFA set out to ‘empower central African nations’, such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), with support for ‘community forests’ and other measures to curb forest loss. Now, after reporting delays, the UK has slashed the CBFA as part of the Labour government’s recent aid cuts, intended to free up money for defence spending. Its original £90m budget has now been reduced to £18.8m. Government data shows that £15m of this has already been spent. This is not the only Congo project that has been dropped due to this latest round of aid cuts. The Congo part of the biodiverse landscapes fund – championed by the previous government and worth at least £12.3m – has been closed, just two years into its seven-year schedule. Government documents reveal more Congo forest funding is at risk as the UK scales back its aid budget, including the UK’s two largest remaining projects in the region. One initiative, intended to ‘incubate forest-friendly enterprises’ in DRC, faces ‘reduc[ed] budgets’. Officials working on the other, while more optimistic, reported that the project may be forced to operate in fewer countries as the cuts set in. Documents also reveal the difficulties that come when operating in the Congo, including ‘complex political economies’ and, in Gabon, a military coup – which ‘complicated matters’. ‘Breaking promises’ Damian Fleming, a senior director of forests at WWF International tells Carbon Brief: ‘Tropical forest countries are making long-term policy and development choices in expectation that international partners will honour their commitments.’ In a series of recent parliamentary responses, Chapman revealed that the UK had only spent £39.8m on Congo forest finance, as of 2024. (She declined to provide any information on the Indonesia and Amazon regional goals.) Despite being presented as the UK’s ‘contribution’ to the £1.1bn-by-2025 global goal agreed at COP26, the £200m target has a deadline of 2029. Therefore, while the collective goal has been met, the UK’s contribution so far has been relatively small. Zac Goldsmith, a former Conservative minister who oversaw the forest targets at COP26, tells Carbon Brief that, in his view, the UK has ‘discarded’ its regional pledges: ‘We have gone from being perhaps the leader on protecting nature internationally to breaking promises to countries around the world for whom the environment is an existential issue.’ Future targets The Labour government says it has met the five-year ‘climate finance’ target of £11.6bn that expires this year.Ministers also say the government has met ‘and exceeded’ the £3bn and £1.5bn sub-goals for ‘preserving nature’ and forests, respectively, within the £11.6bn. These are the funding streams that include support for the Congo basin and other rainforests. The UK has funded a variety of projects in line with its forest goals, including mangrove restoration in Indonesia, support for carbon-offsetting projects in Brazil and promoting ‘forest stewardship’ among farmers in Cameroon. Chapman has stated that the UK will continue to ‘prioritise’ the Congo rainforest, in line with its new plan for aid spending in Africa. The UK even helped to launch a new ‘call to action’ for Congo basin funding at COP30 last year. The UK government also says it supported the creation of Brazil’s flagship ‘Tropical Forest Forever Facility’ (TFFF). However, so far it has not provided any funding for the facility. When the government announced a new climate finance pledge for 2026 onwards, it stressed that nature would still be a ‘focus’ and said it would also generate billions in ‘climate and nature positive investments’. Nevertheless, it dropped the ‘ring-fenced’ amounts for nature and forests that had appeared in its previous pledge. The UK, alongside other developed countries, has pledged to provide biodiversity finance to developing countries, under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) – a non-binding global pact to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030. Sarah Champion, chair of the international development committee of MPs, says ‘sub-pledges’ for nature and forests are a ‘cost-effective and impactful’ way to ensure this finance is provided, alongside climate finance. She tells Carbon Brief that she was ‘concerned’ about the move away from this approach: ‘When the minister recently appeared before the international development committee, I was concerned to hear her characterise this shift as a ‘gamble’.’ A government spokesperson tells Carbon Brief: ‘We remain committed to providing finance for forests, including in the Congo basin, as a core element of our overall climate funding.’ A shorter version of this article was first published in Cropped, Carbon Brief’s fortnightly newsletter that provides a digest of food, land and nature news, on 15 July 2026. Subscribe for free. Livestock heat deaths in transit doubled in UK record-hot summer of 2025 Food and farming | 25.06.26 Q&A: What England’s new ‘land-use framework’ means for climate, nature and food Nature policy | 20.03.26 Analysis: Half of nations meet UN deadline for nature-loss reporting Nature policy | 02.03.26 Brazil’s biodiversity pledge: Six key takeaways for nature and climate change Nature policy | 16.01.26 The post UK withdraws millions in funding from world’s second-largest rainforest in Congo appeared first on Carbon Brief. |