Bassirou Sani Boubacar Gaoh has spent the last decade trying to figure out how the plants feeding millions across Niger can better withstand the unpredictability of a warming planet. Extreme heatwaves and severe droughts that alternate with heavy rainfall and flash floods are imperiling the many millet, rice, and sorghum farms throughout the Sahel region, where temperatures have risen much faster than the global average. Yet the biggest threat to those farms is neither heat, droughts, nor floods, but the infestations unleashed with their arrival. The millet head miner is one of the most notorious of these hordes. The destructive moth lays eggs directly onto the flowering heads of the pearl millet crop, which hatch into larvae that feed voraciously from within the plant’s florets. Drought, sandy soils, and certain farming practices, such as sowing fields too early, only worsen infestations. ‘In a bad year, it can wipe out a large part of a family harvest,’ said Boubacar Gaoh. Domestic agriculture, he noted, is both the West African nation’s economic backbone and the foundation of most families’ access to food. Roughly 2.4 million people throughout Niger face acute food insecurity and 1.6 million children suffer from acute malnutrition. ‘When you’re talking about a crop that feeds the household, that isn’t just lost income. It’s less food on the table,’ he said. Bassirou Sani Boubacar Gaoh (center) and another researcher talk with a farmer in Konni, Niger about the pest challenges he faces in his field. Courtesy of Bassirou Sani Boubacar Gaoh Boubacar Gaoh’s grandparents were millet farmers, so as a plant breeder in Niamey specializing in staple crops, he’s personally invested in developing on-the-ground solutions to help protect growers from pests like the millet head miner. In November of 2024, he launched a program that sought to equip local farmers with the tools they need for crop disease surveillance and pest control. In partnership with an agricultural research hub hosted by Pennsylvania State University, the work was funded through the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Feed the Future Innovation Labs program. From the start, he and his team set out to visit farmers across Niger, offering hands-on training on how to fight pests and disease affecting their harvests, teaching them not only how to use free technologies like PlantVillage, an AI-powered mobile platform for pest and disease forecasting, but how to confront infestations. Solutions for containing infestations vary, but farmers first must spot the bugs behind them — a tricky feat, especially in the case of the millet head miner, which can do some real damage undetected. That’s where monitoring tools, says Boubacar Gaoh, can make all the difference. ‘Timing is everything…it only strikes during a short window as the grain forms,’ he said. ‘The real reduction in crop loss comes from acting on that warning at the right moment.’ Last January, they were preparing to roll out the use of natural predators to eradicate the millet head miner, along with a multitude of other agricultural menaces. They’d even just met with officials at Niger’s Ministry of Agriculture to negotiate use of their data to inform the government’s understanding of crop health and national surveillance systems. Then, without warning, it was all over. On January 24, 2025, days after the inauguration, President Donald Trump issued a stop-work order that suspended nearly all of USAID’s overseas programs, before dismantling the agency entirely. In the months that followed, nearly all of the 17 core Innovation Labs, anchored in American universities with a network of international partners, received funding termination notices. Boubacar Gaoh stayed on part-time, drawing on a small stipend provided by a donor to the Penn State lab, but the rest of his team in Niger was let go. In the year and a half since, he has pivoted to chasing funding sources in an increasingly fraught and competitive philanthropic landscape. He’s had little luck. ‘I was surprised when it was stopped — because, why? Everyone knows that with climate change, pests are moving around. The conditions are so that these pests can grow and develop in the region where previously they couldn’t develop, and affect food supply,’ said Boubacar Gaoh. Boubacar Gaoh’s team conducted diagnostic visits all over Niger, including at a watermelon plot (left) and a vegetable farm (right). Then, without warning, it was all over. Courtesy of Bassirou Sani Boubacar Gaoh A statement by the White House on the funding cuts issued last fall, when it formally cancelled the $72 million funding the program, described USAID’s spending as ‘woke, weaponized, and wasteful.’ By then, the administration had gutted all but one lab. The Climate-Resilient Cereals Innovation Lab at Kansas State University was given the go-ahead to continue its research. (The lab has since rebranded itself to the ‘Innovation Lab for Cereals.’) Because Congress appropriated the funds, questions surfaced on the legality of Trump’s power to withhold the funding, but then the Supreme Court ruled that the president had the discretion to do so. ‘Why were all the other labs terminated?’ Timothy Dalton, then-interim director of the Kansas lab, asked at the time. ‘When they’re doing such critically important work as we are doing, in order to combat global food insecurity and to generate scientific advances that can be harnessed by the U.S. agricultural community?’ A university spokesperson for the cereals lab declined Grist’s request for an interview. This March, the State Department issued a new call for proposals for Feed the Future Innovation Labs, inviting any U.S.-based university to submit a statement of interest in an open competition for the resurrected program. The call for applications described the labs as mechanisms ‘to advance global food security in alignment with U.S. policy through targeted research.’ Approximately five to seven awards were anticipated, the listing noted, ranging from $20 million to $40 million. To the scientists watching their labs get dismantled a year earlier, the announcement raised an obvious question: resurrected for whom, and to do what? Although the labs’ stated goals on hunger and food security haven’t changed much, where the work happens could look very different under the Trump administration’s redesigned version of the program. Former USAID officials and innovation lab directors told Grist that they are concerned that lower-income African regions, which had always been the focus of the program, have now been deprioritized in favor of countries in the Western Hemisphere. ‘A 27-page document of criteria, and Africa gets three paragraphs on the last page,’ said Jim Gaffney, a former general development officer at USAID’s Bureau for Food Security. ‘It never says you should not work in African countries. But it’s obvious it’s not terribly important to them.’ According to one American researcher, ‘We were learning from African colleagues about genetic sources of disease resistance that we could bring over … It was a two-way street.’ Courtesy of Bassirou Sani Boubacar Gaoh Africa just surpassed Asia as the continent with the largest number of people facing hunger, according to the annual State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report released last week by a cohort of United Nations agencies. Swaths of the continent are seeing temperature rises up to 1.5 times the global mean, which imperils food security, ecosystems, and economies, and has fueled mass-displacement and migration. Floods, heatwaves, and droughts forced 700,000 people out of their homes in 2024, according to the U.N. World Meteorological Organization. A growing body of research has found food insecurity, climate change, and migration to be closely interlinked with geopolitical instability. Gaffney says the State Department’s implicit deprioritization of Africa is likely to have created a chilling effect on the number of agricultural research and development proposals focusing on the continent, which could have serious knock-on implications for the global food system. ‘People say, ‘Well, it’s good, it’s great that we’re doing these things for these low-income countries,’ but it’s also great for U.S. research,’ said Gaffney. ‘We solve problems in Africa, and those same problems might hit our shores someday here in the U.S., and we’ll be ready for them.’ The other major change in the call for applications was the erasure of climate-related research priorities. Across the country, universities followed the guidelines: They stripped their submissions of mentions of ‘climate change’ and pivoted to ‘desirable’ geographies. Read Next Trump gutted USAID. Hunger and violence followed. Ayurella Horn-Muller David Hughes, the former director of the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Current and Emerging Threats to Crops at Penn State, which had supported Boubacar Gaoh’s work in Niger, said his team swapped out terms like ‘climate change stress’ for ‘drought’ in their application. Hughes believes that the State Department was ‘running these proposals through word-search or AI.’ The State Department didn’t respond to a question about their decision-making process, but the effects of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, have persisted long after it was disbanded. The Penn State lab also expanded its geographic range. Their application, shared with Grist, listed Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Colombia, Peru, Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, and Nepal as proposed target countries. It did not mention supporting Boubacar Gaoh’s efforts in Niger. ‘We did, of course, maybe do a little more in this hemisphere. Although I point out that this hemisphere includes West Africa as well. I don’t think they know their geography,’ said Hughes. Ultimately, the lab’s application was denied. In a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing last June, Republican Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith, who represents Mississippi, asked Russell Vought, Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, for assurances that specific innovation lab protections, including a Mississippi State University lab focused on fisheries, would be protected from budget cuts. ‘The lab’s work illustrates the proverb, ‘Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.’ This is exactly what the MSU Fish Innovation Lab is doing,’ said Hyde-Smith at the hearing. ‘Rather than giving other countries food, we are teaching them how to feed themselves through modern aquaculture practices.’ The next iteration of innovation labs is starting to take shape. A preliminary list obtained by Grist reveals that approximately seven new project proposals have advanced to the next and final stage of the application round. The labs advancing are from institutions almost exclusively in Republican-majority states. Kansas State University, Mississippi State University, the University of Florida, two labs at Alabama’s Auburn University, South Carolina’s Clemson University, and the University of Georgia were all asked to submit a full proposal, according to multiple sources familiar with the State Department’s new program. The work led by Clemson features a collaboration with the University of Hawaiʻi, making it the only lab with blue-state representation. Sources told Grist that the team behind the Mississippi State proposal is from the very same fisheries lab that Hyde-Smith had publicly lobbied Vought for. The lab declined Grist’s request for an interview. ‘It doesn’t feel like, by chance, it would just be red states receiving these awards,’ said a former USAID official involved with the program who asked to remain anonymous. Others are questioning whether the administration’s newfound version of the innovation labs will actually look all that different to the version that was culled. Carrie Seay-Fleming, an assistant professor specializing in food security and the environment at the University of Minnesota Duluth who has studied the impact of Feed the Future, found a surprisingly similar emphasis on ‘increasing productivity’ and ‘market-based solutions’ in the State Department’s language. ‘Which of course makes you wonder what the cancellation of the old programs achieved,’ said Seay-Fleming. A spokesperson at the State Department told Grist in an email that ‘applications are evaluated against the published criteria in the funding opportunity, without regard to the political characteristics of an applicant’s home state.’ The spokesperson declined to clarify when grant awards would be finalized or announced, nor did they comment on changes to funding criteria. However, the spokesperson did note that the agency plans to obligate funds into awards by the end of the federal fiscal year on September 30. The spokesperson said the Feed the Future innovation labs funding opportunity is evaluated to ensure it makes the country stronger, safer, and more prosperous. In order to align with national interests, foreign assistance and research investments are being directed to ‘directly benefit American farmers, researchers, and taxpayers, rather than being shaped by the priorities of the prior administration,’ the spokesperson added. Among those invited to advance was the Innovation Lab for Peanut at the University of Georgia, which worked with peanut farmers in roughly 13 countries but focused on Senegal, Ghana, Uganda, Malawi, and Zambia, and had been a participant in the earlier version of the USAID program. After the collapse of USAID, the lab was forced to close. When the administration resurrected the funds, former lab leadership decided to apply for the funds and see if they could rebuild much of the work they had been doing beforehand. Jamie Rhoads, former assistant director at the peanut lab, wasn’t optimistic about their chances. ‘We tried to globalize it a little bit, and shifted the language a little bit towards the more safer, stronger, more ‘America First’ kind of language,’ said Rhoads, who contributed to the new proposal. ‘We kind of made a pitch for the sake of the U.S. industry, and also the potential domestic demand happening in Africa, [that] this is a valuable investment to make in Africa.’ So it was a welcome surprise when, in June, the UGA lab advanced to the next, and final, stage of the State Department’s process. ‘It was kind of frustrating because we had to put all this ‘America First’ language into it, but a lot of what we were doing was already, in the best sense of things, using American goodwill and technology,’ said Rhoads. ‘We were learning from African colleagues about genetic sources of disease resistance that we could bring over that are useful for our varieties potentially, or globally. It was a two-way street.’ Indeed, American farmers would also benefit from this type of research based in Africa. That includes farmers like Josh Johnson, who runs the Old Tyme Bean Company in Elloree, South Carolina. In recent years, as rising temperatures have made it increasingly difficult to grow varieties of heat-sensitive Southern crops, Johnson has pivoted toward growing cowpeas, a drought-tolerant crop that’s regionally popular and has long been a major food commodity throughout West and Central Africa. But that introduced Johnson to a whole new threat: the cowpea curculio, a destructive weevil whose larvae feed on the seeds inside the legume’s pod. Within the last two years, the curculio has taken almost half of Johnson’s acreage of the bean plant. Josh Johnson (right) and his sons grow crops like cowpea, a major food commodity in West and Central Africa, on their family farm in Elloree, South Carolina. Courtesy of Josh Johnson ‘You’ll start shelling those peas, and you’ll end up with maggots and larva coming out the shells,’ said Johnson. ‘You can imagine how selling something like that would be terrible…it is a booger-bear to control.’ To fight the wily bug, Johnson sprays the perimeter of his fields with pesticides. But it only does so much. When the small weevil senses a tractor’s movement, it balls up, drops to ground, and plays dead to protect itself, also making it nearly impossible to spot. Johnson says he desperately needs a new tool or technique that would allow him to better track and stave off outbreaks well before they spread. A solution not unlike the on-farm pest surveillance Boubacar Gaoh had been working to develop half a world away. Climate change is only making crop infestations like these worse, forcing farmers and scientists from South Carolina to Niger to contend with new pathogens, as warming temperatures reshuffle the geographic range of pests worldwide. ‘Some pests that you find now in Africa, in a few years maybe you will find it in America. So I think it’s really relevant to deal with them at the source,’ said Boubacar Gaoh. ‘Pests, they don’t need visas to travel.’ This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Inside the ‘America First’ makeover of a global hunger program on Jul 28, 2026.