| The African continent’s hopes for a legally binding agreement to combat drought have been dashed again, as UN land restoration talks in Mongolia passed the issue onto the next set of talks in Egypt in two years’ time. For over a decade, Africa has pushed for a UN protocol on drought risk management that would acknowledge drought as an issue requiring a regional and global – not just a national – response, potentially paving the way for more finance to help ensure water is available when drought hits. A formal protocol would enable countries to transition from reacting to drought once it hits to ‘a proactive enabling mechanism to address drought and its effects such as migration’, said a Tunisian negotiator on behalf of the African Group of countries last week. Once land is regularly too dry and infertile to grow crops or graze animals, people often leave to seek a living elsewhere. But this effort to adopt a protocol, led by Africa, has been resisted at successive land restoration COPs under the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), mainly by developed countries, which argue that a legally weaker alternative – a framework – would be faster and cheaper to set up. A traditional Mongolian Ger tent at COP17 (Photo: Anastasia Rodopolou/IISD ENB) Governments at the previous COP in Saudi Arabia in 2024 failed to reach agreement despite talks running past midnight, while this year’s saw African officials coordinate a walkout from negotiating rooms on Wednesday morning, according to two sources at the talks. Drought deal delayed until 2028 The IISD’s Earth Negotiations Bulletin, a non-governmental organisation which unlike the media is allowed to watch and report on closed-door talks, said a call to suspend negotiations on Wednesday showed negotiations had reached ‘boiling point’ and ‘made some jaws drop’. Negotiations resumed after a lunchtime meeting with the Mongolian COP presidency although governments were only eventually able to agree that they could not find consensus in Ulaanbaatar and should resume talks on an instrument to deal with drought in 2028. Christine Colvin, WWF’s head of freshwater policy, told Climate Home News that, with droughts hitting from Honduras to the English region of Hampshire, something concrete – whether a protocol or a framework – is needed urgently ‘rather than the can being kicked down the road for another two years as will now happen with the protocol procrastination’. Negotiators talk at COP17 (Photo: Anastasia Rodopolou/IISD ENB) But, in a closing press conference on Friday, the Mongolian minister presiding over talks celebrated that governments had reached consensus on several ‘contentious’ issues and that agenda items blocked at this year’s COP17 would be put on the agenda for COP18 in Egypt. US blocks agenda items Other agenda items that divided countries were on measuring land degradation’s effects on women, enhancing the involvement of civil society and women in land COPs, and the UNCCD working more closely and effectively with the UN’s climate and nature conventions. On the COP’s opening day two weeks ago, the US representative said the Trump government objects to these agenda items ‘on their premise and no amount of negotiation will allow us to join consensus on these items. As such we request that they be struck from the agenda at which time we will then be able to approve it, saving us valuable negotiating time.’ A US State Department spokesperson later told Climate Home News that the US wants the UN ‘to get back to basics by refocusing on its core mandate, eliminating overlap, and reducing competition for scarce resources’. The spokesperson added, ‘that means prioritising the concrete work member states created [the UN] to do – rather than diverting limited time, attention, and resources toward social and political agendas, including gender-related initiatives.’ A protester calls for Indigenous Peoples, local communities, women and youth to be on the agenda of COP17 (Photo: Anastasia Rodopoulou/IISD ENB) On COP’s first day, the European Union and Brazil pushed back against the blocking of these agenda items, with a Brazilian negotiator saying his country attaches ‘great importance’ to them. But the Mongolian presidency directed governments to adopt the rest of the agenda without the controversial items, which were discussed privately with countries throughout the two weeks. An EU statement, read out later by Irish minister Timmy Dooley, accused ‘some parties’ (meaning national governments) of having adopted a ‘less constructive approach’ and preventing ‘discussions on important matters from even commencing’. The agenda items the US refused to engage with were never discussed and were only placed onto the agenda for the next COP on the last day. Those talks will take place in Egypt in two years’ time, with Donald Trump due then to be in his last year as US president. No restoration without women The blocking of the gender agenda item has stymied attempts, agreed on by governments at the last COP, to develop gender-specific indicators for the UNCCD’s next overall framework and to facilitate more women delegates at COPs. Women made up only about a quarter of delegates to COP15 in 2022, UNCCD analysis with the latest data shows Criticising the move to keep gender off the agenda, the EU said in a statement that it welcomes ‘the attention being given at COP17 to women pastoralists and herders, recognising their contribution to sustainable land management and resilient rural livelihoods’. The head of the UNCCD, former Egyptian environment minister Yasmine Fouad, said on Friday that ‘regardless that the agenda item was blocked’, she was proud that she and COP17 President Batmunkh Battsetseg had led the COP as women and attended the gender caucus (a meeting of groups supporting women at the talks). Yasmine Fouad and Batmunkh Battsetseg talk at the COP17 closing press conference (Photo: Kiara Worth/UNCCD) ‘Without the women,’ she told the closing press conference on Friday, ‘we will not be able to restore land, restore hope, restore life or restore even our children and grandchildren. And we will keep on pushing that agenda.’ The civil society agenda item aimed to allow NGOs to attend land COP negotiations, as they do at climate COPs, and included terms of reference for an Indigenous Peoples Caucus. A representative of Indigenous Peoples told the COP’s closing plenary meeting that the group had ‘deep disappointment that the agenda of this COP has removed the dedicated space for indigenous peoples’. ‘We cannot restore the land while removing the voices of those who care for it,’ she said. On Tuesday, the UNCCD’s deputy head Andrea Meza was asked about Indigenous Peoples’ participation. She said that the blocking of ‘one agenda item’ is ‘generating uncertainty in the progress’ towards creating caucuses for Indigenous Peoples and for Local Communities within the talks. Because of the ‘complex geopolitical situation’ making it hard to obtain consensus, coalitions of the willing have become more important, she added. Mining out, money in Outside the formal negotiations, the summit was marked by a focus on the strongly Mongolian issues of the role played by pastoralists and rangelands like grasslands, as well as mining, in both degrading and restoring land. Part of the conference was sponsored by Australian mining company Rio Tinto and its local partner Oyu Tolgoi. Their presence was protested by campaigners wearing T-shirts calling on the companies to ‘stop wasting drinking water’ and to ‘get out of Mongolia’. A campaigner protests at COP17 on Thursday (Photo by IISD/ENB | Anastasia Rodopoulou) The UNCDD and others praised the success of the summit in raising more finance for land restoration. The COP saw institutions like the Asian Development Bank and Global Environment Facility pledge money to combat land degradation, with the UNCCD estimating that $645 million of new commitments were made. An estimated $355 billion a year is needed through 2030 to meet global land restoration commitments, compared with around $77 billion currently invested. Private finance accounts for only around 6% of global investment, according to the UNCCD. UNCCD chief scientist Baron Orr told a press conference that many of the announcements were public-private partnerships that use government money to ‘even the playing field’ for companies that want to protect land, in a bid to ensure they are not disadvantaged compared with those that do not. Such partnerships are a ‘huge opportunity’, he said, especially as ‘we’re not in a moment of public finance – public finance is tight in every country.’ The post Despite African walkout, fractious land COP ends without drought deal appeared first on Climate Home News. |